Response to editorial

Response to editorial comments

✍ McLeod, David G. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB 👁 1 views

Response to editorial comment

✍ Lau, Kean-Wah ;Hung, Jui-Sung 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 115 KB 👁 1 views

Letters to the Editor ## Response to Editorial Comment We are writing to express concern over the misinterpretation by Dr. Feldman in his editorial comment [ 11 regarding our balloonsizing method in Inoue mitral commissurotomy [2]. In the aforementioned article, we extended the observations in ou

Response to Dr. Kinsella's editorial

✍ Michael T. Selch 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 366 KB

Response to editorial by Mario Roederer

✍ Carleton C. Stewart; Sigrid J. Stewart 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 94 KB

Response to Editorial: No Failures Found

✍ Gregg K. Hobbs 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 20 KB

Letter to the Editor ## Response to Editorial: No Failures Found The relationship modeled by T. W. Williams for fault coverage is D = [1-Y (1-T) ] where: D the defect level, Y the theoretical functional process yield and T the Dear Sir fault coverage of the test program used. There are three basi

WIN-R revisited: Response to editorial

✍ Ira M. Jacobson; Robert S. Brown Jr 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 46 KB

We thank Drs. Han and Smith for their thoughtful editorial 1 that accompanied our 2 papers describing results of the WIN-R (Weight-Based Dosing of Peginterferon alfa-2b and Ribavirin) trial, 2,3 in which patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with peginterferon (PEG-IFN) alfa-2b 1.5 g/kg/wee