๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Response to Dr. Peschel

โœ Scribed by Aidnag Z. Diaz; Mack Roach III


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
162 KB
Volume
30
Category
Article
ISSN
0360-3016

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Response to Drs. Peschel and Wallner
โœ Christopher Koprowski ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 361 KB
Response to Dr. Koss
โœ Paul F. Mazzara; John C. Panos ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 22 KB
Response to Dr. Chen
โœ Ken Gatter ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 15 KB
Response to Dr. Hook
โœ Marion, Robert W. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 41 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Response to Dr. Marino
โœ Andrew Bush ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 13 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Response to Dr. Pratt
โœ David Egilman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 52 KB

The issues raised in Dr. Pratt's letter [1992] would seem to miss the main point. The unhappy 30-year period of inaction and unchecked asbestos exposure of workers from 1935 to 1964 as noted in Enterline [1991], contains enough minutiae to enable anyone who wishes to find rationale for uncertainty,