✦ LIBER ✦

Response to Dr. C.-G. Ohlson

✍ Scribed by Thomas F. Mancuso

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1989
Tongue: English
Weight: 258 KB
Volume: 15
Category: Article
ISSN: 0271-3586
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700150312

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Dr. C. McDonald and Dr. A. M

Response to Dr. C. McDonald and Dr. A. McDonald

✍ Dr. Thomas Mancuso 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB

The comment about "a typical latent period" is misleading and my response was previously stated in the reply to Ohlson [ 19891. Essentially, the latent periods for the various studies are a reflection of the definition time of the cohorts and the period of follow-up. The Mancuso study by the very na

Professor Dr G C Mönch

📂 Article 📅 1967 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 118 KB

Response to Dr. Koss

✍ Paul F. Mazzara; John C. Panos 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 22 KB

Response to Dr. Chen

✍ Ken Gatter 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 15 KB

Response to Dr. Hook

✍ Marion, Robert W. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 41 KB 👁 1 views

Response to Dr. Marino

✍ Andrew Bush 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 13 KB 👁 1 views