๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Response to commentary

โœ Scribed by Zahava Solomon; Yahanan Wozner; Mark Waysman

Publisher
Springer
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
198 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
0894-9867

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis

We definitely share many of the ideas and beliefs expressed by the author of the comment. We especially agree that participation in war may lead to severe post-traumatic reactions, some of which may last for years after the event and that clinicians have a responsibility to aid in rehabilitation of these war casualties. Unfortunately, however, the criticisms directed at the Koach Project appear to be based largely on a very fundamental misunderstanding of the nature and the aims of this project. In the second sentence, the author writes that the Koach Project was conceived "with the intention of returning wam'ors stricken with PTSD to com-

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Commentaries
Response to Commentaries
โœ J.G. Taylor ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 114 KB
Response to section editors' commentary
Response to section editors' commentary
โœ Subra Kugathasan; Steven L. Werlin; Ernest G. Seidman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 209 KB
Response to Dr. Dunnigan's Commentary
Response to Dr. Dunnigan's Commentary
โœ John M. Craighead ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1988 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 190 KB
Response to commentary: Ethical dimensio
Response to commentary: Ethical dimensions of the BEIP
โœ CHARLES H. ZEANAH; SEBASTIAN F. KOGA; BOGDAN SIMION; ALIN STANESCU; CRISTIAN L. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 56 KB

We appreciate the thoughtful commentary on our paper that Dr. Wassenaar provided and welcome the opportunity to address several concerns raised in it. Because of space limitations, we did not cover all aspects of the study in the article, and we are pleased to have an opportunity to clarify several