The WHO EMF program would do well to acknowledge recent biological research and promote forward looking policies in the spirit of the Precautionary Principle, rather than continue to insist that the status quo is just fine. Our environment is changing rapidly, both in the power frequency range, but
✦ LIBER ✦
Response to comment by Blank and Goodman on “BEMS, WHO, and the precautionary principle”
✍ Scribed by Michael H. Repacholi
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 36 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0197-8462
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Response to “Comment: BEMS, WHO, and the
✍
Ben Greenebaum
📂
Article
📅
2007
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 41 KB
👁 1 views
BEMS, WHO, and the precautionary princip
✍
Martin Blank; Reba Goodman
📂
Article
📅
2007
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 42 KB
👁 1 views
Reply to “A biological guide for electro
✍
Ron Petersen
📂
Article
📅
2004
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 34 KB
Correlation between clinical response to
✍
Rolf Rau
📂
Article
📅
2003
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 143 KB
Response to the Comments by Larichev, Ko
✍
F. A. LOOTSMA; J. BARZILAI
📂
Article
📅
1997
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 93 KB
We are pleased to continue the open discussion in this journal and we hope that it will contribute to the clarification of the main issues. Aggregation by geometric means has been accepted as a technically sound procedure. The critical comments now seem to concentrate on the establishment of the Mul
Comment on the comment by Dr. Marino and
✍
Robert K. Adair
📂
Article
📅
2003
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 40 KB
👁 1 views