✦ LIBER ✦

Response from de Bernard and Aricò

✍ Scribed by Marina de Bernard; Beatrice Aricò

Book ID: 117680737
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1998
Tongue: English
Weight: 98 KB
Volume: 6
Category: Article
ISSN: 0966-842X
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01241-4

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

St. Bernard and Raoul de Houdenc

✍ Stanley Leman Galpin 📂 Article 📅 1913 🏛 John Hopkins University Press ⚖ 320 KB

Deterrence and utility again: A response

Deterrence and utility again: A response to Bernard

✍ Gregory S. Kavka 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 188 KB

In my earlier article (Kavka, 1980), I examined a simplified version of the bilateral nuclear balance of terror from the point of view of utilitarian moral theory. I suggested that the leaders of the U.S. face a choice between one policy (i.e., disarming their country) that appears to them to pose a

Potential Confounder: Bernard and de Bur

Potential Confounder: Bernard and de Burbure Respond

✍ Alfred Bernard and Claire de Burbure 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Environmental Health Information Service 🌐 English ⚖ 242 KB

Response from De Weerd, Desimone and Ung

Response from De Weerd, Desimone and Ungerleider

✍ P De Weerd; L.G Ungerleider; R Desimone 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 91 KB

Ethics and Australian Defence Policy: A

Ethics and Australian Defence Policy: A Response to Bernard Swan

✍ T. R. Frame 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 373 KB

Response from Ellis, Young, Quayle and d

Response from Ellis, Young, Quayle and de Pauw

✍ H.D. Ellis; A.H. Quaylea; A.W. Young; K.W. de Pauw 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB