๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Response and Rebuttal

โœ Scribed by Thomas J. Anglem

Book ID
115068497
Publisher
American Cancer Society
Year
1973
Tongue
English
Weight
237 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-9235

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Dr. Riordan's rebuttal
Response to Dr. Riordan's rebuttal
โœ DiGiano, Francis A. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1982 ๐Ÿ› American Chemical Society ๐ŸŒ English โš– 169 KB
Plaud's rebuttal to Ilardi and Feldman's
Plaud's rebuttal to Ilardi and Feldman's response
โœ Joseph J. Plaud ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 22 KB

In this brief rebuttal to Ilardi and Feldman's response to my commentary on their view of the future of a clinical psychology awash in mentalistic and biological terminology, I wish to respond to two interrelated issues brought up by the authors: the role of causality in psychological inquiry, and t

Fibrous glass insulation and cancer: Res
Fibrous glass insulation and cancer: Response and rebuttal
โœ Peter F. Infante; Loretta D. Schuman; James Huff ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 842 KB

In response to our commentary on fibrous glass and cancer [Infante et al., 1994], three letters have been received by the journal. The arguments put forth in these letters do not lead us to alter our scientific view that fibrous glass insulation is carcinogenic. No information is given in the letter

Rebuttal: Response to Dr. Morton Kern
Rebuttal: Response to Dr. Morton Kern
โœ Valeria Magni; Alaide Chieffo; Antonio Colombo ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 30 KB