## Purpose: To differentiate prostate carcinoma from healthy peripheral zone and central gland using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (dce) magnetic resonance (mr) imaging and two-dimensional (1)h mr spectroscopic imaging (mrsi) combined into one clinical protocol. ## Materials and methods:
Reproducibility of 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate at 1.5T
✍ Scribed by Miriam W. Lagemaat; Christian M. Zechmann; Jurgen J. Fütterer; Elisabeth Weiland; Jianping Lu; Geert M. Villeirs; Barbara A. Holshouser; Paul van Hecke; Marc Lemort; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Jelle O. Barentsz; Stefan O. Roell; Arend Heerschap; Tom W.J. Scheenen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 351 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose:
To determine the reproducibility of 3D proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (^1^H‐MRSI) of the human prostate in a multicenter setting at 1.5T.
Materials and Methods:
Fourteen subjects were measured twice with 3D point‐resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) ^1^H‐MRSI using an endorectal coil. MRSI voxels were selected in the peripheral zone and combined central gland at the same location in the prostate in both measurements. Voxels with approved spectral quality were included to calculate Bland–Altman parameters for reproducibility from the choline plus creatine to citrate ratio (CC/C). The repeated spectroscopic data were also evaluated with a standardized clinical scoring system.
Results:
A total of 74 voxels were included for reproducibility analysis. The complete range of biologically interesting CC/C ratios was covered. The overall within‐voxel standard deviation (SD) of the CC/C ratio of the repeated measurements was 0.13. This value is equal to the between‐subject SD of noncancer prostate tissue. In >90% of the voxels the standardized clinical score did not differ relevantly between the measurements.
Conclusion:
Repeated measurements of in vivo 3D ^1^H‐MRSI of the complete prostate at 1.5T produce equal and quantitative results. The reproducibility of the technique is high enough to provide it as a reliable tool in assessing tumor presence in the prostate. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:166‐173. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To prospectively compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T and 1.5 T in the same patients for preoperative evaluation of endometrial carcinoma. ## Materials and Methods Thirty consecutive patients with endometrial carcinoma underwent MRI at both 3.0 T and 1.5 T as
## Abstract The authors reviewed their 21/2‐year experience with a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol for a 1.5‐T MR imager that included T2‐weighted fat‐suppressed spin‐echo, T1‐weighted breath‐hold gradient‐echo, and serial dynamic gadolinium‐enhanced T1‐weighted gradient‐echo imaging to id
## Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the MR compatibility of ceramic instruments. Nine different ceramic instruments were tested with respect to ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts using previously described techniques. There was no magnetic field attraction, temperature increas
## Abstract Single‐voxel proton spectra of the human brain were recorded in five subjects at both 1.5T and 3.0T using the STEAM pulse sequence. Data acquisition parameters were closely matched between the two field strengths. Spectra were recorded in the white matter of the centrum semiovale and in