✦ LIBER ✦

Representing risk preferences in expected utility based decision models

✍ Scribed by Jack Meyer

Publisher: Springer US
Year: 2008
Tongue: English
Weight: 282 KB
Volume: 176
Category: Article
ISSN: 0254-5330
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-008-0381-7

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Risk seeking with diminishing marginal u

Risk seeking with diminishing marginal utility in a non-expected utility model

✍ Alain Chateauneuf; Michéle Cohen 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 727 KB

Diversification, convex preferences and

Diversification, convex preferences and non-empty core in the Choquet expected utility model

✍ Alain Chateauneuf; Jean-Marc Tallon 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 134 KB

More pessimism than greediness: a charac

More pessimism than greediness: a characterization of monotone risk aversion in the rank-dependent expected utility model

✍ Alain Chateauneuf; Michéle Cohen; Isaac Meilijson 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 196 KB

Risk-aversion concepts in expected- and

Risk-aversion concepts in expected- and non-expected-utility models : 074074 (E12) Cohen M.D., Université de Paris I, France, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, Vol. 20, nr. 01, 1995, pp. 73–91

📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 117 KB

Axioms and models in decision making und

Axioms and models in decision making under uncertainty: Peter C. Fishburn. The Foundation of Expected Utility. In Theory and Decision Library (Vol. 31). Dordrecht: Reidel, 1982. pp. xii + 171 + index. $39.50

✍ Mark J Machina 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 502 KB

093049 (E12) Risk aversion with state-de

093049 (E12) Risk aversion with state-dependent preferences in the rank-dependent expected utility theory : Chiu H., The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, vol. 21, No 2, 1996, pp. 159–177

📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 90 KB

## 267 several carcinogens, these upper bounds are often summoned to estimate overall risk. This begs the question of whether a sum of upper bounds is itself a plausible estimate of overall risk. This question can be asked in two ways: whether the sum yields an improbable estimate of overall risk