Since this reviewer is a linguist, more specifically a "cognitive linguist", it is worth beginning this review with some significant differences in perspective betwecn linguistics and AI, as well as some general remarks about what each can contribute to the other. Linguistics, in particular linguis
Representations of commonsense knowledge: Ernest Davis
β Scribed by Daniel S. Weld
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 443 KB
- Volume
- 61
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0004-3702
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Introduction
I highly recommend Davis' Representations of Commonsense Knowledge; it is a truly advanced synthesis of over twenty years of research in a broad area of artificial intelligence. As the first truly graduate-level textbook for core AI, Davis' book fills a huge gap.
By "graduate-level" I mean that the book requires a firm grasp of logic, demands considerable mathematical sophistication, and is not appropriate for students who have not completed a serious undergraduate course on AI; the book is extremely dense. By "core AI" I mean that the text is not a general book on artificial intelligence; for example, there is no discussion of expert systems, robotics, or natural language. In fact, some "core" topics are missing as well: search and learning are absent, and there is almost no discussion of reasoning, inference, or automated deduction. As the title suggests, the scope is commonsense knowledge of an intelligent being. Davis has integrated and formalized a large fraction of the knowledge required to manipulate the physical world and interact with other agents.
Since the treatment is deep and the subject area large, it is unsurprising that the book has a bias--it emphasizes representation rather than reasoning. In a manner reminiscent of Hayes' "Naive physics manifesto" [5], Davis' style is to insightfully encode the axioms necessary for competence in a domain, but
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
My friend Dan Weld is so kind in his review that my only possible response is to thank him for his pleasant words. William Croft is certainly correct in saying that "AI research on commonsense reasoning could benefit from input from linguistic semantics". I am grateful for the overview of linguisti
This is a call for papers in areas including memory devices, circuit implementations, design philosophy, logical and algebraic aspects, hardware and software logic, applications of logic, feasibility studies, and human factors in man-computer systems.
Strategic (control) knowledge typically specifies how a target task is solved. Representing such knowledge declaratively remains a difficult and practical knowledge engineering challenge. The key to addressing this challenge rests on two observations. One, strategic knowledge comprises two finer typ