✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to the remarks

✍ Scribed by M. Pietralla

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1984
Tongue: English
Weight: 115 KB
Volume: 35
Category: Article
ISSN: 0323-7648
DOI: 10.1002/actp.1984.010350613

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Chhabra's remarks

✍ Y.I. Cho; J.P. Hartnett 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 149 KB

Reply to the remarks of Maslov

✍ D.D. Sworder 📂 Article 📅 1967 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 58 KB

Reply to the remarks of Golecki

✍ Yu Chen 📂 Article 📅 1968 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 150 KB

We would like

A reply to some remarks on genette's str

A reply to some remarks on genette's structuralism

✍ Harold F. Mosher Jr. 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 336 KB

Two remarks concerning Dr. Finck's reply

✍ I. Prigogine; P. Van Rysselberghe 📂 Article 📅 1949 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB

Reply to Blakey and Armelagos, with addi

Reply to Blakey and Armelagos, with additional remarks on the hypoplastic area method

✍ Ensor, Bradley E.; Irish, Joel D. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 34 KB 👁 1 views

The article by Ensor and Irish (1995) attributes to itself the first ''methodology to determine the amount [duration] of hypoplasia for comparing populations based on individuals,'' and states that ''no specific method for assessing the level of stress for comparative purposes has appeared in the li