๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Reply to the letter

โœ Scribed by Todd K. Rosengart; Timothy A. Sanborn; Neil Hackett; Ronald G. Crystal


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
488 KB
Volume
56
Category
Article
ISSN
1522-1946

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Joseph et al. [1] have described well the techniques for opening percutaneously the completely occluded aortic isthmus. We would submit, however, that what they have crossed and dilated so well is not congenital atresia of the aortic isthmus, but acquired complete occlusion in congenital coarctation of the aortic isthmus.

Atresia or interruption of the aortic arch as an isolated congenital malformation is extremely rare [2-5]. To find four such patients among 26 undergoing balloon angioplasty of aortic coarctation would be more than extraordinary. Intimal proliferation due to turbulent flow, however, is found at the aortic coarctation site in virtually all patients, tends to progress with age, and not uncommonly completely occludes the lumen [6]. Among 70 aortic coarctations serially sectioned and examined histologically, we found 4 (6%) with complete occlusion of the lumen, and in each the mechanism of occlusion was intimal proliferation (Fig. 1).

In most patients with aortic coarctation, blood flow to the descending aorta is primarily via collaterals, and consequently severe stenosis or complete occlusion at the coarctation site presents the same clinical picture. Joseph et al. [1] comment several times that the clinical features of their four patients were similar to those of patients with aortic coarctation, and the reason is that their patients had aortic coarctation.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Reply to the letter
โœ Ashok Koul; Gerald Hollander; Jacob Shani ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 73 KB
Reply to the letter
โœ Stefano Sdringola; Abid Assali; Richard W. Smalling ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 24 KB
Reply to the letter
โœ Daniel I. Simon ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 31 KB
Reply to the letter
โœ Stephen J. Duffy; Ian T. Meredith ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 32 KB
Reply to the letter
โœ Anthony Licata ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 33 KB
Reply to the letter
โœ Upendra Kaul ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 36 KB

We would like to comment on several issues of concern in the recent article by Kaul et al. [1] that presented the results of the Integrilin in Acute Myocardial Infarction (INAMI) stenting study. First, the authors state that the decrease in the rate of TIMI flow grade 3 from 93% immediately followin