✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to the comments on “Reply to the comments on ‘The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation’ (by S.Y. Zhang, X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772)”

✍ Scribed by X.Z. Chen; C.X. Bi

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Weight: 84 KB
Volume: 298
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-460X
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.05.039

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comments on “Reply to the comments on ‘T

Comments on “Reply to the comments on ‘The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation’ (by S.Y. Zhang and X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772)”

✍ Sean F. Wu 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 78 KB

Reply to the comments on “The boundary p

Reply to the comments on “The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation” (by S.Y. Zhang, X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772)

✍ X.Z. Chen; C.X. Bi 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 92 KB

Comments on “The boundary point method f

Comments on “The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation problem” [S.Y. Zhang, X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772]

✍ J.T. Chen; I.L. Chen; Y.T. Lee 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 113 KB

Comments on “The boundary point method f

Comments on “The boundary point method for the calculation of exterior acoustic radiation” (by S.Y. Zhang and X.Z. Chen, Journal of Sound and Vibration 228(4) (1999) 761–772)

✍ Sean F. Wu 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 74 KB

This paper is fundamentally wrong. The major mistake is the replacement of Eq. ( 1) by ( 3). The authors intend to replace the acoustic field radiated by an arbitrary structure by that of a cube with uniform source distribution inside the real source surface. This substitution will be fine, provided