๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Reply to Saksena: Further reflections on verb agreement in Hindi

โœ Scribed by COMRIE, BERNARD


Book ID
111941294
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
Year
1985
Tongue
English
Weight
711 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0024-3949

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Saksena (this issue) fails to respond to the challenges offered in Comrie (1984), in particular the call to view Hindi verb agreement against the background of a general linguistic approach to verb agreement, and thereby threatens to disrupt the fruitful interplay between work on Hindi and general linguistic theory.

When two authors engage in a controversy from radically different standpoints, there is a danger that their arguments will largely pass each other by and soon lose the interest of spectators, even of those who are in principle interested in the domain where the controversy originally arose. In this brief reply, therefore, I will attempt to state the main differences between Saksena's standpoint and my own, as I see them, and hope that readers of Linguistics will then make their own decision as to which line of argumentation they find most fruitful. I have divided my further reflections into two sections: descriptive and explanatory.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Reflections on verb agreement in Hindi a
โœ COMRIE, BERNARD ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG ๐ŸŒ English โš– 840 KB

It is possible to state verb agreement in Hindi in terms of word order and surface case, with no reference to grammatical relations: the verb agrees with the leftmost phonologically null instance of case marking (Saksena 1981: 468). It is questioned whether this is, however, the correct statement of