✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to S. P. Srivastava and W. R. Roest

✍ Scribed by M. F. Gerstell; J. M. Stock

Publisher: Springer
Year: 1996
Tongue: English
Weight: 22 KB
Volume: 18
Category: Article
ISSN: 0025-3235
DOI: 10.1007/bf00310071

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to R. F. Shurtz' comment and R. M.

Reply to R. F. Shurtz' comment and R. M. Srivastava's and E. H. Isaaks' reply

✍ Herzfeld, Ute Christina 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 118 KB

Reply to the letter from A. Bagga and R.

Reply to the letter from A. Bagga and R.N. Srivastava

✍ P. D. Yorgin; Amira Y. Al-Uzri 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 13 KB

A reply to R. W. Nesbitt and L. A. Hartm

A reply to R. W. Nesbitt and L. A. Hartmann

✍ D. Flinn; D. T. Moffat 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 225 KB

The paper by Flinn and Moffat (1985) on which Nesbitt and Hartmann comment reiterates geological evidence from the Cunningsburgh area of Shetland published in this journal sometime ago (Flinn 1967) and adds to it some previously unpublished details of a spinifex-like texture in the Cunningsburgh ser

Reply to S. Shackley and R. D. Brunner

✍ Paul N. Edwards 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 217 KB

Reply to comments by P. L. Silveston and

Reply to comments by P. L. Silveston and R. R. Hudgins

✍ K.B.S. Prasad 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 42 KB

Comments on the reply of R.S. Dietz and

Comments on the reply of R.S. Dietz and W.v. Engelhardt

✍ A. R. Crawford 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB

The authors state in their third sentence that the paper is 'a new attempt to discredit the reality of meteoritic impact structures on earth ..... '. That this is untrue will be apparent to anyone who reads the first sentence of my second paragraph, in which I say that '. .... the impact hypothesis