✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to Krueger's Criticism of the Multiple Factor Theory

✍ Scribed by Gray, J. S.

Book ID: 121141071
Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Year: 1947
Tongue: English
Weight: 160 KB
Volume: 105
Category: Article
ISSN: 0036-8075
DOI: 10.1126/science.105.2731.466

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Professor Schjellerup's Critici

Reply to Professor Schjellerup's Criticism of Lunar Theory

✍ John N. Stockwell 📂 Article 📅 1875 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 388 KB

Calculation of phosphorimeter factor - r

Calculation of phosphorimeter factor - reply to a criticism

✍ C.A. Parker 📂 Article 📅 1970 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB

Contrary to a recent stateunent. the procedure adopted for evaluating'the efficiency of P-type delayed fluorescence with "fast chopping" gives the correct value corresponding to the rate of light absorption measured. However. previously reported values of the probability factor, PC. need correction

Reply to Leiter's criticism of a new the

Reply to Leiter's criticism of a new theory of elementary matter

✍ Mendel Sachs 📂 Article 📅 1974 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 175 KB

Changing the Theory of Theory Change - R

Changing the Theory of Theory Change - Reply to My Critics

✍ Tennant, Neil 📂 Fiction 📅 0 🌐 English ⚖ 345 KB

Comment on: “calculation of phosporimete

Comment on: “calculation of phosporimeter factor - reply to a criticism”

✍ K. Razi Naqvi 📂 Article 📅 1970 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 84 KB

Reply to Donald C. Williams' Criticism o

Reply to Donald C. Williams' Criticism of the Frequency Theory of Probability

✍ Hans Reichenbach 📂 Article 📅 1945 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 193 KB