✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to J. Ausubel

✍ Scribed by Amory B. Lovins; L. Hunter Lovins

Publisher: Springer
Year: 1983
Tongue: English
Weight: 250 KB
Volume: 5
Category: Article
ISSN: 0165-0009
DOI: 10.1007/bf02423431

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to J. Ausubel

✍ Amory B. Lovins; L. Hunter Lovins 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 250 KB

Jesse Ausubel's review (Ausubel, 1982) of our recent joint analysis (Lovins et al., 1982) stimulates us to suggest, in the same friendly spirit, a few respects in which he missed the mark. In considering how little energy could be used, and how little fossil fuel burned, if people used energy in a

Reply to J. J. Kallas

✍ R. Krishna 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 60 KB

Kenny Ausubel

📂 Fiction 📅 2012 🌐 English ⚖ 2 MB

Reply to D. J. Mullan

✍ Bibhas R. De 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 81 KB

Reply to J. Hall's letter

✍ Adrian M. Duijvestijn 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 334 KB

Authors' reply to comments by J.J.J. Che

Authors' reply to comments by J.J.J. Chen

✍ L.T. Fan; Y.W. Huang; N. Yutani 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 123 KB

Furthermore, von Karman and Tsien (1938) found the formula (LJ = (2J" in "closer agreement with experimental data". More recently, Svoboda and Hartman (1981) and Hartman and Svoboda (1986) have used the following formula in fluidization studies. Il 1.81 x 1O-5 (10) Thus, if either eq. (8) or (9), du