๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Reply to: Infectious communication: Smart phones for clinical communication

โœ Scribed by Sherman Quan; Robert Wu


Book ID
102343626
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
70 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
1553-5592

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


We would like to thank Brady et al. for their response to our study evaluating the use of smartphones for clinical communication and for highlighting the important potential concern of nosocomial infections transmitted through mobile devices.

While there are studies in the hospital environment documenting the presence of pathogenic bacteria on mobile communication devices such as smartphones, the rate in smartphones appears to be similar to the current standard communication device, the pager. 1 We see the potential transmission of nosocomial infections as an important issue that needs to be addressed but should not be a barrier to improving clinical communication. We agree with their proposed steps to reduce cross-contamination risks that include staff education, strict hand hygiene measures,


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Infectious communication: Smart phones f
โœ Richard R. W. Brady; Akila Visvanathan; Mark Rodrigues; Alan P. Gibb ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 74 KB

We read with interest the recent study 1 evaluating utilization of smart phones for clinical communication. While debate remains over efficiency and quality of care benefits, an additional concern is the implication of such technology for infection control. More than 20 studies have demonstrated th