Reply to the Ziebold and Cooper reply to Yao on "Multi-component diffusion"\*
Reply to comment “On the surface self-diffusion coefficient”
✍ Scribed by N.A Gjostein; J.P Hirth
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1966
- Weight
- 309 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0001-6160
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
899
where AGa is the Gibbs free energy for formation of adsorbed atoms and g a geometrical factor depending on their source (4) Thus within the limitations of the model of surface diffusion by adsorbed atom migration the surface tracer diffusivity is, apart from correlation factors, t,he same as that derived for mass transfer.
It must therefore be concluded that in order to predict whether in any set of experiments the tracer diffusivity will differ from the mass transport value, the relaxation time associated with the approach to local equilibrium must be known.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Now wvaph = -Pwv2h so that (aAG/ap)T = AV and any pressure-variation of AF (through elastic moduli) is irrelevant. A lattice diffusivity increasing with increasing pressure implies a negative activation volume AV. However, it is not certain that the simple effect on lattice diffusion was measured