✦ LIBER ✦

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Pressure derivative of the bulk modulus’ by A. M. Hofmeister”]

✍ Scribed by Hofmeister, Anne M.

Book ID: 119687652
Publisher: American Geophysical Union
Year: 1992
Tongue: English
Weight: 81 KB
Volume: 97
Category: Article
ISSN: 0148-0227
DOI: 10.1029/92jb01386

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comment [on “Pressure derivative of the

Comment [on “Pressure derivative of the bulk modulus” by A. M. Hofmeister]

✍ Jeanloz, Raymond 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 77 KB

On the Philosophy of Modeling-Reply to a

On the Philosophy of Modeling-Reply to a Comment by M. R. Droop

✍ Curtiss O. Davis and Paul J. Harrison 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Ocea 🌐 English ⚖ 410 KB

Reply [to “Comment on ‘The elastic modul

Reply [to “Comment on ‘The elastic modulus of media containing strongly interacting antiplane cracks’ by Paul M. Davis and Leon Knopoff”]

✍ Davis, Paul M.; Knopoff, Leon 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 286 KB

Reply to “Comment on ‘Missing pressure i

Reply to “Comment on ‘Missing pressure in the dayside ionosphere of Venus’”

✍ Cloutier, P. A.; Stewart, B. K.; Taylor, H. A. 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 173 KB

Reply to Comment on ‘Optical poling of o

Reply to Comment on ‘Optical poling of oligoether acrylate photopolymers doped by stilbene-benzoate derivative chromophores’

✍ Kityk, I V; Gondek, E; Krzeminska, L; Danel, A 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Institute of Physics 🌐 English ⚖ 40 KB

A reply to the discussion by A.M. Brandt

A reply to the discussion by A.M. Brandt of the paper “Young's modulus of concrete reconsidered”

✍ J.M. Torrenti; C. Boulay; C. Puch 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 73 KB

I appreciate the paper and results, but cannot agree with the authors that the results are basically different than those which I obtained many years ago and which were published in references 5,6, and 7. I have found that the values of strain in the central part of a compressed specimen were a bit