There is ample contemporary evidence that most meteorological thermometers in Australia were not exposed in Stevenson screens until very late in the nineteenth century, and in many places not until well into the twentieth century. There is also evidence, from a long-running comparison at Adelaide, t
REPLY: COMMENT ON ‘HISTORICAL THERMOMETER EXPOSURES IN AUSTRALIA’
✍ Scribed by NICHOLLS, N.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 24 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0899-8418
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The extra detail provided by Warwick Hughes con®rms the point made by Nicholls et al. (1996), namely that at Adelaide the maximum temperatures measured in a Glaisher stand are substantially higher than those measured in a Stevenson screen. Minimum temperatures are, on average, slightly lower in the Glaisher stand. So, as pointed out in Nicholls et al. (1966), mean temperatures for Australia during the nineteenth century, which were often measured in a Glaisher stand or a similar open exposure, would be biased warm, relative to twentieth century measurements.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
This short note presents seasonal time series for the 1888ÿ1946 period of Adelaide temperature records comparing Glaisher stand and Stevenson screen data, as examined by Nicholls et al.. Site changes and a station move may account for discontinuities in the seasonal trends, which make the data unrep
## Abstract This short note reviews the Minutes of two Intercolonial Meteorological Conferences, held at Melbourne, Australia in 1881 and 1888, where the transcripts refer to the use of the Stevenson screen. Additional historical and modern material is reviewed demonstrating the use of the Stevenso