✦ LIBER ✦

Reply by the authors to the comments submitted by B. C. Syrett

✍ Scribed by P.K. Chauhan; H.S. Gadiyar

Book ID: 115846523
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1985
Tongue: English
Weight: 83 KB
Volume: 25
Category: Article
ISSN: 0010-938X
DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(85)90063-0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Authors' reply to comments by C. Yao

✍ Richard G. Rice; Duong D. Do 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 72 KB

Authors' reply to comments by J. B. Josh

Authors' reply to comments by J. B. Joshi

✍ M.P. Duduković; N. Devanathan; D. Moslemian 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 222 KB

Letters to the Editors 509 whereas they were non-interacting in the earlier model. It may be emphasised that the flow visualised by Joshi is akin to the complete solution of equation of motion (Lee and Korpela, 1983).

Authors' reply to comments by C.M. Crowe

✍ R.D. Skeirik; E.A. Grulke 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 206 KB

Author’s Reply to Comments by B Zeldovic

Author’s Reply to Comments by B Zeldovich

✍ Bums, Robert P. 📂 Article 📅 1965 🏛 The Optical Society 🌐 English ⚖ 322 KB

Reply to Comment by B. C. Eaton

✍ John M. Hartwick and Philip G. Hartwick 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 351 KB

Authors' reply to comments by R.P. Chhab

Authors' reply to comments by R.P. Chhabra

✍ Andrzej B. Jarzębski; Janusz J. Malinowski 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 181 KB

Fig. 1. Comparison between the results of Bhavaraju er al. (1978) and the theory of JM. seen to be excellent in the ranges 0.7 < n < 1 and 0 < r$ < 0.6. The two analyses, however, begin to diverge as the value of n drops below 0.7; which is anyway outside the range of applicability of the treatment