✦ LIBER ✦

Reply by Dr. McDonald

✍ Scribed by Michael W. McDonald

Book ID: 119044931
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1983
Tongue: English
Weight: 124 KB
Volume: 21
Category: Article
ISSN: 0090-4295
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(83)90144-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Dr. C. McDonald and Dr. A. M

Response to Dr. C. McDonald and Dr. A. McDonald

✍ Dr. Thomas Mancuso 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB

The comment about "a typical latent period" is misleading and my response was previously stated in the reply to Ohlson [ 19891. Essentially, the latent periods for the various studies are a reflection of the definition time of the cohorts and the period of follow-up. The Mancuso study by the very na

Dr. Ellice McDonald

📂 Article 📅 1955 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 366 KB

During that time Dr . McDonald introduced a solution

Dr. McDonald's relpy

📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 612 KB

Reply from J.F. McDonald

✍ John McDonald 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 41 KB

McDonald and colleagues reply

✍ Kwong, Peter D.; McDonald, Neil Q.; Economides, Aris N.; Stahl, Neil; Yancopoulo 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 268 KB

Reply by Dr Wang

✍ C.-B. Wang 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 431 KB