## Abstract The objective of this study was to compare efficacy, safety, and duration of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT‐A) and type B (BoNT‐B) in toxin‐naïve cervical dystonia (CD) subjects. BoNT‐naïve CD subjects were randomized to BoNT‐A or BoNT‐B and evaluated in a double‐blind trial at baseline a
✦ LIBER ✦
Reply: Botulinum toxin type B vs. type A in toxin-naïve patients with cervical dystonia: Randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial
✍ Scribed by Eric J. Pappert
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 53 KB
- Volume
- 24
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Botulinum toxin type B vs. type A in tox
✍
Eric J. Pappert; Terry Germanson
📂
Article
📅
2008
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 131 KB
Re: Botulinum toxin type B vs. Type a in
✍
Joerg Mueller
📂
Article
📅
2008
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 53 KB
Efficacy and safety of botulinum type A
✍
Daniel Truong; Drake D. Duane; Joseph Jankovic; Carlos Singer; Lauren C. Seeberg
📂
Article
📅
2005
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 89 KB
## Abstract Botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) has been shown in European studies to be a safe and effective treatment for cervical dystonia. This multicenter, double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial assessed the safety and efficacy of Dysport in cervical dystonia patients in the United States. Ei