Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery mra versus contrast-enhanced MRA
✍ Scribed by Michael M. Y. Khoo; Dhafer Deeab; Wladyslaw M. W. Gedroyc; Neil Duncan; David Taube; Elizabeth A. Dick
- Book ID
- 113032867
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 278 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0938-7994
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To study the potential detrimental effects of renal motion on breath‐hold three‐dimensional contrast‐enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). ## Materials and Methods A computer model simulating linear motion was applied to MRA pulse sequences. Subsequently, to
## Abstract ## Purpose: To assess the performance of a three‐dimensional (3D) non‐contrast respiratory‐triggered steady state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence for detection of renal artery stenosis. ## Materials and Methods: A total of 64 patients who had non‐contrast MR angiography (NC MRA