## Objective: The purpose of this study was to use a swedish version of the geriatric depression scale (gds-20) for diagnosis of depression in the elderly in primary care. ## Design: Elderly consecutive patients visiting two primary care centres (> or = 65 years of age; n = 1189) were rated by ed
Remission in major depression: results from a geriatric primary care population
✍ Scribed by Armin R. Azar; Mohit P. Chopra; Lydia Y. Cho; Eugenie Coakley; James L. Rudolph
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 186 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6230
- DOI
- 10.1002/gps.2485
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Objectives
While a recent task force report recommended that remission from major depression be defined according to DSM criteria, most previous work has used depressive symptom rating scales. The current study sought to identify baseline factors associated with treatment outcome in major depression, diagnosed according to DSM‐IV criteria.
Methods
Data from the Primary Care Research in Substance Abuse and Mental Health for the Elderly (PRISM‐E) study were utilized. This analysis focused on 792 geriatric primary care patients with major depression at baseline, which was randomized to services by a mental health professional in primary care or specialty settings. Major depression was diagnosed according to DSM‐IV criteria based on a structured interview at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcome was the absence of any DSM‐IV depressive disorder at six‐month follow‐up. Association with baseline demographic characteristics, comorbid anxiety disorder, ‘at risk’ drinking, number of co‐occurring medical conditions, and depressive symptom severity was examined using multiple logistic regression modeling.
Results
Remission occurred in 228 (29%) patients with completed follow‐up assessments, while 564 (71%) did not remit. Factors which increased the odds of non‐remission included comorbid anxiety (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.11–2.31), female sex (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.04–2.15), general medical comorbidity (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.07–1.24), and increased baseline depressive symptom severity (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03–1.06).
Conclusions
The findings underscore the importance of using DSM criteria to define remission from major depression, and suggest that concurrent measurement of depression severity, comorbid anxiety, and medical comorbidity are important in identifying patients requiring targeted interventions to optimize remission from major depression. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Objectives Identifying the predictors of late‐life depression that are amenable to change may lead to interventions that result in better and faster remission. Thus, the authors investigated the impact of two different strategies for coping with physical illness on depression in older, primary c
## Abstract ## Objective To estimate the predictive value of the 30‐question Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in Spanish and calculate the most adequate cut‐point for its use in Primary Health Care consultations. ## Method 218 patients over the age of 64 treated at three health centers of Area 1
## Abstract International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2002; 17: 279–287 DOI: 10.1002/gps.588 It has come to our attention that there was an error to one of the author names within this published article. The correct author listing is now published below. We apologise for this anomaly. M. I.
## Abstract ## Objective We suggest that clinicians consider models of shared decision‐making (SDM) for their potential ability to improve the treatment of major depression in the primary care setting and overcome limitations of collaborative care and other interventions. ## Methods We explore t