𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Reliability of two techniques for assessing cerebral iron deposits with structural magnetic resonance imaging

✍ Scribed by Maria C. Valdés Hernández; Tina H. Jeong; Catherine Murray; Mark E. Bastin; Francesca M. Chappell; Ian J. Deary; Joanna M. Wardlaw


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
812 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose

To test the reliability of two computational methods for segmenting cerebral iron deposits (IDs) in the aging brain, given that its measurement in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is challenging due to the similar effect produced by other minerals, especially calcium, on T2*‐weighted sequences.

Materials and Methods

T1‐, T2*‐weighted, and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR brain images obtained at 1.5T from 70 subjects in their early 70s who displayed a wide range of brain IDs were analyzed. The first segmentation method used a multispectral approach based on the fusion of two or more structural sequences registered and mapped in the red/green color space followed by Minimum Variance Quantization. The second method employed a combined thresholding, size and shape analysis using T2*‐weighted images augmented with visual information from T1‐weighted data.

Results

Both segmentation techniques had high intra‐ and interobserver agreement (95% confidence interval [CI] = ± 57 voxels in a range from 0 to 1800), which decreased in subjects with significant microbleeds and/or IDs. However, the thresholding method was more observer dependent in identifying microbleeds and IDs boundaries than the multispectral approach.

Conclusion

Both techniques proved to be in agreement and have good intra‐ and interobserver reliability. However, they have limitations, specifically with regard to automation and observer independence, so further work is required to develop fully user‐independent methods of identifying cerebral IDs. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:54–61. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.