This paper contains a study about decision making in groups. The author analyzes the manipulability of four voting systems: Borda, Coombs, Hare, and plurality. The Hare voting system was found to be the least manipulable; the Borda, the most manipulable. The results of this study indicate that the l
β¦ LIBER β¦
Relative Efficiency of Voting Systems
β Scribed by Hoffman, Dale T.
- Book ID
- 118195832
- Publisher
- Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 844 KB
- Volume
- 43
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0036-1399
- DOI
- 10.1137/0143080
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
An investigation into the relative manip
β
John R. Chamberlin
π
Article
π
1985
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 758 KB
ON THE RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF HEALTH CAR
β
Jene K. Kwon
π
Article
π
1974
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 803 KB
A Note on Relative Efficiency of Axiom S
β
Sandra Fontani; Franco Montagna; Andrea Sorbi
π
Article
π
1994
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 664 KB
## Abstract We introduce a notion of relative efficiency for axiom systems. Given an axiom system __A__~Ξ²~ for a theory __T__ consistent with __S__^1^~2~, we show that the problem of deciding whether an axiom system __A__~Ξ±~ for the same theory is more efficient than __A__~Ξ²~ is II~2~βhard. Several
Modeling the relative efficiency of nati
β
Jiancheng Guan; Kaihua Chen
π
Article
π
2012
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 631 KB
Efficient voting with no selling of vote
β
Valtteri Niemi; Ari Renvall
π
Article
π
1999
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 106 KB
Capacity of voting systems
β
Rangarajan, S.; Jalote, P.; Tripathi, S.K.
π
Article
π
1993
π
IEEE
π
English
β 919 KB