𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Relative difference sets, graphs and inequivalence of functions between groups

✍ Scribed by K. J. Horadam


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
154 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
1063-8539

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

For cryptographic purposes, we want to find functions with both low differential uniformity and dissimilarity to all linear functions and to know when such functions are essentially different. For vectorial Boolean functions, extended affine equivalence and the coarser Carlet–Charpin–Zinoviev (CCZ) equivalence are both used to distinguish between nonlinear functions. It remains hard to tell when CCZ equivalent functions are EA‐inequivalent. This paper presents a framework for solving this problem in full generality, for functions between arbitrary finite groups. This common framework is based on relative difference sets (RDSs). The CCZ and EA equivalence classes of perfect nonlinear (PN) functions are each derived, by quite different processes, from equivalence classes of splitting semiregular RDSs. By generalizing these processes, we obtain a much strengthened formula for all the graph equivalences which define the EA equivalence class of a given function, amongst those which define its CCZ equivalence class. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Combin Designs 18: 260–273, 2010


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Application of Gaschütz' Theorem to rela
✍ John C. Galati 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 80 KB

## Abstract Let __G__ be a finite group other than ℤ~4~ and suppose that __G__ contains a semiregular relative difference set (RDS) relative to a central subgroup __U__. We apply Gaschütz' Theorem from finite group theory to show that if __G__/__U__ has cyclic Sylow subgroups for each prime divisor

Assessment of the sensitivity of the rel
✍ Martie J.A. van Tongeren; Hans Kromhout; Kerry Gardiner; Ian A. Calvert; J. Malc 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 133 KB

relations and standard errors are indicative of the robustness of these equations. Therefore, the equations appear to be a useful tool in establishing the most ef®cient way of utilizing exposure measurements.