One specific prediction emerging from trait-group models of natural selection is that when individuals possess traits that benefit other group members, natural selection will favor "cheating" (i.e. not possessing the group-beneficial trait) within groups. Cheating is selected within groups because i
Relatedness in Trait Group Models of Social Evolution
β Scribed by JOHN W PEPPER
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 230 KB
- Volume
- 206
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5193
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Genetic relatedness is a central concept in the study of social evolution. Though originally de"ned in terms of genealogy, the modern version of relatedness accommodates genetic similarity of any origin. This paper examines relatedness in group structured modes, in which a trait a!ects the "tness of all group members. Such traits can be divided into two types, based on whether their group "tness e!ects encompass all group members including the actor (&&whole-group traits''), or only group members other than the actor (&&other-only traits''). Both trait types are common in nature as well as in theoretical models, but they have rarely been distinguished clearly. The average relatedness of recipients to actors di!ers for the two trait types within the same population and even the same individual, leading to di!erent selection pressures and evolutionary outcomes. Total relatedness in group-structured models can be partitioned into two components: structural relatedness due to the size and number of groups in the population, and assortative relatedness due to the distribution of genotypes among groups. Each component di!ers for whole-group vs. other-only traits, both in terms of their values and the factors that in#uence them. Some key di!erences include: positive relatedness requires positive assortment for other-only but not for whole-group traits; negative relatedness is possible for other-only but not whole-group traits; relatedness depends on average group size for whole-group but not other-only traits, and non-random assortment into groups a!ects relatedness more strongly for other-only than whole-group traits. Recognizing the distinction between these trait types resolves some apparent contradictions in the literature, and clari"es the limits of some previous results.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Stalkβeyed flies of the family Diopsidae exhibit a unique form of hypercephaly, which has evolved under both natural and sexual selection. Male hypercephaly is used by female diopsids as an indicator of male quality. By choosing to mate with males expressing the mostβexaggerated hyperce