✦ LIBER ✦

Rejoinder to the discussion of ‘Adversarial risk analysis: Borel games’

✍ Scribed by David Banks; Francesca Petralia; Shouqiang Wang

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 70 KB
Volume: 27
Category: Article
ISSN: 1524-1904
DOI: 10.1002/asmb.891

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Discussion on ‘Adversarial risk analysis

Discussion on ‘Adversarial risk analysis: Borel games’

✍ Nicholas Polson 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB

Adversarial Risk Analysis: What's new, w

Adversarial Risk Analysis: What's new, what isn't?: Discussion of Adversarial Risk Analysis: Borel Games

✍ Joseph B. Kadane 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB

The purpose of this comment is to put Adversarial Risk Analysis into historical perspective. To what extent is it a 'new research area' adding 'anticipating the actions of one's opponents' to traditional risk analysis [1, p. 852]? To what extent is it the application of already published principles