Regional Organization of the Social Security Administration a Case Study
โ Scribed by John A. Davis
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Year
- 2019
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 316
- Series
- Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law; 571
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Deals with matters such as the effect of central organization, lines of supervision, the difficulties of field organization, and the nature of general regional command of the Social Security Administration.
โฆ Table of Contents
Preface
Table of Contents
I. The Value of the Regional Organization of the Social Security Administration as a Type
II. SSA Regional Organization: Its Nature, Advantages and Technical Problems
III. The Evolution of the Organizational Pattern of the Social Security Administration
IV. The Organization and the Activities of the Regional Offices
V. The Determination of Area and the Location of Headquarters
VI. The Determination of Lines of Supervision
VII. The Difficulties and Advantages of Functionalization
VIII. Basic Techniques of Clearance and Coordination: Administrative Orders and Field Units
IX. Techniques of Communication and Control
X. The Regional Director: General Regional Command
XI. Conclusion
Index
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Annotation.<span class='showMoreLessContentElement' style='display: none;'><p>Social security reform in the United States continues to be a pressing and contentious issue, with advocates touting some form of a centralized or a privatized system of personal accounts. In general, centralized systems o
<div>Social security reform in the United States continues to be a pressing and contentious issue, with advocates touting some form of a centralized or a privatized system of personal accounts. In general, centralized systems offer low administrative costs, but are potentially subject to political m
Organizations act, but what determines how and when they will act? There is precedent for believing that the organization is but an extension of one or a few people, but this is a deceptively simplified approach and, in reality, makes any generalization in organizational theory enormously difficult.