✦ LIBER ✦

Regarding the need, or lack thereof, of a comparator group for pregnancy registries

✍ Scribed by Rachel Charlton; Marianne Cunnington; John Weil; Corinne de Vries

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 41 KB
Volume: 85
Category: Article
ISSN: 1542-0752
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20598

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Measurements of birth defect prevalence:

Measurements of birth defect prevalence: Which is most useful as a comparator group for pharmaceutical pregnancy registries?

✍ Angela Scheuerle; Vani X. Vannappagari; Mary K. Miller 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 108 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Pharmaceutical pregnancy registries document birth defects and other complications reported in pregnancies exposed to specific medications or diseases. A baseline estimate of birth defect prevalence is necessary for comparison. To identify potential teratogenic signals, the pregnancy re

Two criteria for the comparison of multi

Two criteria for the comparison of multiple arrangements of experiments and their use to answer the question: Is it better to compare p treatment groups with p controls or with a single control

✍ Dr. M. Horn 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 521 KB

I n experimental situations examining the effectiveness of p (p z 1) treatmente by comparing treated groups and untreated controls the following question arose: Which experimental arrangement is more appropriate, an arrangement A, using for the p comparisons only one single control, or an arrangemen