Written by a prominent contributor to recent debates on the welfare state, this is the first in-depth comparison of the UK and Germany as two large, but highly distinct, European welfare states. Spanning a 25-year period, this innovative analysis provides a systematic comparison of policy change acr
Reforming European Welfare States: Germany and the United Kingdom Compared
β Scribed by Jochen Clasen
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 264
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Welfare state reform has been a focus of domestic policy making in many European countries in recent years. Representing almost a third of the EU population and two distinctive models of European welfare states, this book compares development in British and German social policy over the past 25 years. During this time four periods of conservative governments were followed by centre-left administrations in both countries. Moreover, the respective economic and social positions of the two countries have been reversed. Adverse socio-economic developments have contributed to the waning of the erstwhile appeal of Germany as a role model of welfare capitalism. By contrast, the UK is seen by some as being on its way to gaining such a position. These trends provide an analytically intriguing background for a systematic contextualized comparison of reform processes in the two welfare states. Concentrating on three core domains of social policy, the book argues that unemployment support and public pension programs have been subjected to retrenchment, as well as to restructuring. By contrast, family policies have been extended in both countries. However, patterns of retrenchment and restructuring differ across countries and programs. In order to explain similarities and variations, the book emphasizes the relevance of three sets of factors: shifts in party policy preferences and power relations, three institutional variables, and contingent factors impinging on policy direction and profiles. Within pension policy, the relevance of different institutional characteristics and the respective balance between private and public forms of retirement suggest that the concept of 'path dependence' is particularly instructive. By contrast, differences in program structures and their role within national political economies prove to be most relevant for the understanding of changes in unemployment support policy. Less institutionally embedded and expanding, the trajectories of family policies have to be seen in the context of dynamic party policy preferences.
β¦ Table of Contents
Contents......Page 8
List of Figures......Page 10
List of Tables......Page 12
List of Appendices......Page 14
1. Introduction......Page 16
2. Welfare state reform and restructuring......Page 26
3. Motives, means, and opportunities: analytical perspectives......Page 38
4. Supporting unemployed people: income protection and activation......Page 68
5. Retirement pensions......Page 108
6. Family policy: charting new waters......Page 152
7. Conclusion......Page 202
Appendices......Page 210
References......Page 230
C......Page 258
F......Page 259
I......Page 260
N......Page 261
R......Page 262
V......Page 263
Y......Page 264
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Welfare state reform has been a focus of domestic policy making in many European countries in recent years. Representing almost a third of the EU population and two distinctive models of European welfare states, this book compares development in British and German social policy over the past 25 year
Doing Procedure provides an in-depth comparison of criminal defence work in different legal cultures, showing how defence work is shaped by different regimes and how it influences outcomes.
This book explains how the success of attempts to expand the boundaries of the postwar welfare state in The Netherlands and the United Kingdom depended on organized labor's willingness to support redistribution of risk and income among different groups of workers. By illuminating and explaining diff
The existing welfare regime literature identifies differences in welfare state systems. Sarah FΓΆrster asks, if we can learn something on the organizational level about the embedding of philanthropic foundations in the field of social welfare in different welfare state systems. This investigation is