The second part of Theorem 2 of this paper is a special case of Theorem 1 of Rothmann and Russo (Statistics & Probability Letters 11 (1991) 403-410). While the first part of Theorem 2 does not follow explicitly from Theorem 1 of Rothmann and Russo, it can be derived using the arguments in their proo
β¦ LIBER β¦
Refinement of a zero-one law for maxima
β Scribed by R.J. Tomkins
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 140 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0167-7152
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Refinement of a zero-one law for maxima
β
R.J. Tomkins
π
Article
π
1997
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 27 KB
A zero-one law for stationary sequences
β
David Tanny
π
Article
π
1974
π
Springer
π
English
β 358 KB
A βzero-oneβ law for diophantine approxi
β
V. StakΔnas
π
Article
π
1996
π
Springer
π
English
β 171 KB
On a zero-one law
β
P. BΓ‘rtfai; P. RΓ©vΓ©sz
π
Article
π
1967
π
Springer
π
English
β 238 KB
A stronger Kolmogorov zero-one law for r
β
Jack Jie Dai
π
Article
π
2003
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 135 KB
Resource-bounded measure has been deΓΏned on the classes E; E2; ESPACE; E2SPACE; REC, and the class of all languages. It is shown here that if C is any of these classes and X is a set of languages that is closed under ΓΏnite variations and has outer measure Β‘ 1 in C, then X has measure 0 in C. This re
A zero-one law for random subgroups of s
β
Yair Glasner
π
Article
π
2009
π
SP BirkhΓ€user Verlag Boston
π
English
β 345 KB