𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Reduction in orofacial clefts following folic acid fortification of the U.S. grain supply

✍ Scribed by Mahsa M. Yazdy; Margaret A. Honein; Jian Xing


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
133 KB
Volume
79
Category
Article
ISSN
1542-0752

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Folic acid fortification in the United States became mandatory January 1, 1998, to reduce the occurrence of neural tube defects (NTDs). We evaluated the impact of folic acid fortification on orofacial clefts using United States birth certificate data for 45 states and the District of Columbia.

METHODS:

Prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated comparing orofacial cleft prevalence among births prefortification (1/1990–12/1996) and postfortification (10/1998–12/2002), based on fortification status at conception. The JoinPoint Regression Program and exponentially weighted moving average charts (EWMA) were used to assess the timing of any statistically significant changes in prevalence. Data were stratified by maternal race/ethnicity, age, smoking, and timing of prenatal care.

RESULTS:

Orofacial clefts declined following folic acid fortification (PR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.92–0.96). The EWMA chart flagged a significant decrease in the fourth quarter of 1998. The JoinPoint graph had one change in slope, with a significant quarterly percent change (βˆ’0.34) between 1996 and 2002. The decline in orofacial clefts occurred in non‐Hispanic Whites but not other racial/ethnic groups, nonsmokers but not women who reported smoking during pregnancy, and women who received prenatal care in the first trimester but not women who began receiving care later in pregnancy.

CONCLUSION:

Folic acid fortification in the United States was associated with a small decrease in orofacial cleft prevalence, with the timing of the decline consistent with the introduction of fortification. The decline is much smaller than that observed for NTDs, but nonetheless suggests an additional benefit of this public health intervention. Birth Defects Research (Part A) Β© 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Interpreting changes in the epidemiology
✍ Lilah M. Besser; Laura J. Williams; Janet D. Cragan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 295 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: The prevalence of anencephaly (AN) and spina bifida (SB) was declining long before fortification of enriched grains in the U.S. with folic acid. We examined whether changes in these defects surrounding fortification could be distinguished from preexisting trends. ## MET

Decline in the prevalence of neural tube
✍ Abdul-Rauf Sayed; David Bourne; Robert Pattinson; Jo Nixon; Bertram Henderson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 91 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract **BACKGROUND:** In October 2003 South Africa embarked on a program of folic acid fortification of staple foods. We measured the change in prevalence of NTDs before and after fortification and assessed the cost benefit of this primary health care intervention. **METHODS:** Since the begi