𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Recovery: What does this mean to patients with low back pain?

✍ Scribed by Hush, Julia M. ;Refshauge, Kathryn ;Sullivan, Gerard ;De Souza, Lorraine ;Maher, Christopher G. ;McAuley, James H.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
84 KB
Volume
61
Category
Article
ISSN
0004-3591

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Objective

To explore patients' perceptions of recovery from low back pain, about which little is known.

Methods

A qualitative study was conducted in which 36 participants, either recovered or unrecovered from low back pain, participated in focus groups. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis was used to identify emergent themes and domains of recovery.

Results

Patients' views of recovery encompassed a range of factors that can be broadly classified into the domains of symptom attenuation, improved capacity to perform a broad scope of self‐defined functional activities, and achievement of an acceptable quality of life. An interactive model is proposed to describe the relationships between these domains, cognitive appraisal of the pain experience, and self‐rated recovery. Pain attenuation alone was not a reliable indicator of recovery.

Conclusion

The construct of recovery for typical back pain patients seeking primary care is more complex than previously recognized and is a highly individual construct, determined by appraisal of the impact of symptoms on daily functional activities as well as quality of life factors. These findings will be valuable for reassessing how to optimize measures of recovery from low back pain by addressing the spectrum of factors patients consider meaningful.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prevalence of and screening for serious
✍ Nicholas Henschke; Christopher G. Maher; Kathryn M. Refshauge; Robert D. Herbert 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 230 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective To determine the prevalence of serious pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain, and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recommended “red flag” screening questions. ## Methods An inception cohort of 1,172 consecutive patients