Reconstruction of the hand and upper limb with free flaps based on musculocutaneous perforators

✍ Scribed by Hung-Chi Chen; Yueh-Bih Tang; Samir Mardini; Bo-Wen Tsai

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2004
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 433 KB
• Volume: 24
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0738-1085
• DOI: 10.1002/micr.20019

✦ Synopsis

Since the advent of perforator flaps, a wide variety of applications have been documented. This study focuses on free flaps based on musculocutaneous perforators, because they have not been well-described in the literature of upper-limb reconstruction. They can be trimmed to be thin and pliable, and may provide large flaps with multiple components on the same pedicle to facilitate three-dimensional inset of flaps. Microvascular free flaps based on musculocutaneous perforators were performed in 36 cases for reconstruction of the thumb and thenar web, palm, dorsum of the hand, wrist, and forearm. They included the anterolateral thigh perforator flap (27 cases), thoracodorsal perforator flap (5 cases), and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (4 cases). In 2 other cases not included in this series, the thoracodorsal perforator flap could not be elevated due to anatomical variations. There was no failure in this series, but complications included: 1) hematoma in 2 cases, and 2) infection in 2 cases with flap rim necrosis which was treated by a local rotation flap and skin graft. The thin flaps facilitated secondary reconstructive procedures, and only minor effort was required for the debulking procedure of the flaps. On average, these patients required 2.3 occasions of secondary procedures for further reconstruction following coverage with a perforator flap. The perforator flaps provide medium-thickness flaps for coverage of large defects in the upper limb with improved aesthetics and function. With careful dissection of the musculocutaneous perforators and primary thinning of the flaps, the use of a perforator flap is quite safe. Preservation of the muscles leads to better preservation of donor-site functions. Less requirement of secondary debulking procedures is a great advantage. However, caution should be taken in the presence of wound infection.