✦ LIBER ✦

Reconstructing and Evaluating Genetic Arguments in Judicial Decisions

✍ Scribed by H. José Plug

Book ID: 106351188
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 203 KB
Volume: 19
Category: Article
ISSN: 0920-427X
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-005-0511-1

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reconstructing Complex Analogy Argumenta

Reconstructing Complex Analogy Argumentation in Judicial Decisions: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

✍ Harm Kloosterhuis 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 151 KB

The Rational Reconstruction of Weighing

The Rational Reconstruction of Weighing and Balancing on the Basis of Teleological-Evaluative Considerations in the Justification of Judicial Decisions

✍ EVELINE T. FETERIS 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 80 KB

Evaluating decisions in mental capacity

Evaluating decisions in mental capacity assessments

✍ Michel Silberfeld 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 607 KB

One hundred and eleven capacity assessments are described where three criteria to assess the ability to make decisions were investigated. These were ability to identify decision options, the ability to understand the consequences of decisions and the ability to implement decisions. The effectiveness

On The Validity Of Judicial Decisions In

On The Validity Of Judicial Decisions In The Nazi Era

📂 Article 📅 1960 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 972 KB

Argument and Decision Making in Computer

Argument and Decision Making in Computer-Mediated Groups

✍ Daisy R. Lemus; David R. Seibold; Andrew J. Flanagin; Miriam J. Metzger 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 106 KB

“This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”:

“This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments

✍ Davide Mazzi 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 172 KB