A critique of the 2000 update of the Ame
โ
Kenneth D. Brandt
๐
Article
๐
2001
๐
John Wiley and Sons
๐
English
โ 63 KB
๐ 2 views
little information on methodology. They cite abstracts (which seems hard to defend) and provide no quality assessments or estimates of effect sizes or NNT. The lack of a comprehensive search strategy and of quality assessments and the inclusion of abstracts are particularly worrying given that it is