## Abstract Public preferences are typically incorporated into cost‐effectiveness analyses (CEA) on the basis of the average health state utilities of a sample of individuals drawn from the general public. The cost‐effectiveness of a programme is then assessed on an ‘all‐or‐nothing’ basis: the prog
✦ LIBER ✦
Recognising diversity in public preferences: the use of preference sub-groups in cost-effectiveness analysis. Authors' reply
✍ Scribed by Mark Sculpher; Amiram Gafni
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 52 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9230
- DOI
- 10.1002/hec.736
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Recognizing diversity in public preferen
✍
Mark Sculpher; Amiram Gafni
📂
Article
📅
2001
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 62 KB
👁 1 views
Recognising diversity in public preferen
✍
Angela Robinson; David Parkin
📂
Article
📅
2002
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 63 KB
👁 1 views
A recent paper in this journal by Sculpher and Gafni (henceforth S&G), argues for the use of 'preference sub-groups' in determining health state utilities values for use in cost-effectiveness analyses [1]. S&G adopt as a starting point the suggestion that the source of utilities should be the genera