In this article, we propose a survey of the use of bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. On the one hand, the notion of bipolarity relies on the presence of two kinds of entities that have a diametrically opposed nature and that represent repellent forces (a positive entity and a negative entity).
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
β Scribed by Sanjay Modgil
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 543 KB
- Volume
- 173
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0004-3702
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This article evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of arguments based on appeals to expertise. The intersection of two areas is explored: (i) the traditional argumentum ad verecundiam (literally, "appeal to modesty," but characteristically the appeal to the authority of expert judgment) in informal
In order to enable the database programmer to reason about relations over strings of arbitrary length, we introduce alignment calculus, a modal extension of the relational calculus. In addition to relations, a state in the model consists of a two-dimensional array where the strings are aligned on to
Although many formalisms for reasoning about action exist, surprisingly few approaches have taken computational complexity into consideration. The contributions of this article are the following: a temporal logic with a restriction for which deciding satisfiability is tractable, a tractable extensio