<div>What happens when deconstruction reads politics? This collection of essays by some of Derrida's most significant readers thinks through deconstruction's relation to politics by explicating the text of Derrida in relation to political examples. Neither 'deconstruction' nor 'reading' nor 'politic
Reading Deconstruction/Deconstructive Reading
β Scribed by G. Douglas Atkins
- Publisher
- University Press of Kentucky
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 172
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Deconstructionβa mode of close reading associated with the contemporary philosopher Jacques Derrida and other members of the "Yale School"βis the current critical rage, and is likely to remain so for some time. Reading Deconstruction / Deconstructive Reading offers a unique, informed, and badly needed introduction to this important movement, written by one of its most sensitive and lucid practitioners. More than an introduction, this book makes a significant addition to the current debate in critical theory.
G. Douglas Atkins first analyzes and explains deconstruction theory and practice. Focusing on such major critics and theorists as Derrida, J. Hillis Miller, and Geoffrey Hartman, he brings to the fore issues previously scanted in accounts of deconstruction, especially its religious implications. Then, through close readings of such texts as Religio Laici, A Tale of a Tub, and An Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot, he proceeds to demonstrate and exemplify a mode of deconstruction indebted to both Derrida and Paul de Man. This skillfully organized book, designed to reflect the "both/ and" nature of deconstruction, thus makes its own contribution to deconstructive practice. The important readings provided of Dryden, Swift, and Pope are among the first to treat major Augustan texts from a deconstructive point of view and make the book a valuable addition to the study of that period.
Well versed in deconstruction, the variety of texts he treats, and major issues of current concern in literary study, Atkins offers in this book a balanced and judicious defense of deconstruction that avoids being polemical, dogmatic, or narrowly ideological. Whereas much previous work on and in deconstruction has been notable for its thick prose, jargon, and general obfuscation, this book will be appreciated for its clarity and grace, as well as for its command of an impressively wide range of texts and issues. Without taming it as an instrument of analysis and potential change, Atkins makes deconstruction comprehensible to the general reader. His efforts will interest all those concerned with literary theory and criticism, Augustan literature, and the relation of literature and religion
β¦ Table of Contents
Content: pt. 1. Reading deconstruction: The sign as a structure of difference: Derridean deconstruction and some of its implications --
Dehellenizing literary criticism --
Reader-responsibility criticism: the recent work of Geoffrey Hartman --
J. Hillis Miller, deconstruction, and the recovery of transcendence --
pt. 2. Reading deconstruction becomes deconstructive reading: The story of error --
pt. 3. Deconstructive reading: Reading and/as swerving: the quest(ion) of interpretive authority in Dryden's Religio laici --
Allegory of blindness and insight: will and will-ing in A tale of a tub --
"Grac[ing] these ribalds: the play of difference in Pope's Epistle to Dr. Arbuthnot --
The vanity of human wishes: a conclusion in which nothing is concluded.
β¦ Subjects
Deconstruction. DΓ©construction. Derrida, Jacques. Aufsatzsammlung. Dekonstruktion. Deconstruction Derrida, Jacques, -- 1930-2004.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>Looking beyond its presumed demise, Nealon sees its insights as continuing to figure importantly in postmodernist critical debates.</p>
<span>Investigates, by way of Derrida's engagements with Kant, how the foundations of modern constitutionalism can be differently conceived to address some of the challenges of the twenty-first century.</span>
Deconstructive Constitutionalism explores the relationship between the thinking of Immanuel Kant and Jacques Derrida concerning modern constitutionalism. Kant is widely recognized as one of the philosophical forebears of modern constitutionalism; that is, the notion that state powers should be defin
This article focuses on the so-called get-passive, frequently regarded as a problematic construction in the linguistic literature. It is my contention that a lexically-based approach is insufficient to account for the appropriateness of the get-passive, since pragmatic and contextual factors are als