✦ LIBER ✦

Re: Routine Flexible Nephroscopy for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones with Low Density: A Prospective, Randomized Study

✍ Scribed by Sharma, Kuldeep; Singh, Vishwajeet; Garg, Manish

Book ID: 122521084
Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Year: 2013
Tongue: English
Weight: 54 KB
Volume: 190
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-5347
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.114

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Routine Flexible Nephroscopy for Percuta

Routine Flexible Nephroscopy for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones with Low Density: A Prospective, Randomized Study

✍ Gücük, Adnan; Kemahlı, Eray; Üyetürk, Uğur; Tuygun, Can; Yıldız, Mevlüt; Metin, 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 🌐 English ⚖ 170 KB

Modified Supine versus Prone Position in

Modified Supine versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones Treatable with a Single Percutaneous Access: A Prospective Randomized Trial

✍ Marco De Sio; Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe Quarto; Francesco Calabrò; Rocco Damia 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 252 KB

Editorial Comment on: Modified Supine ve

Editorial Comment on: Modified Supine versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones Treatable with a Single Percutaneous Access: A Prospective Randomized Trial

✍ Alberto Breda 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 98 KB

Editorial Comment on: Modified Supine ve

Editorial Comment on: Modified Supine versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones Treatable with a Single Percutaneous Access: A Prospective Randomized Trial

✍ Hansjörg Danuser 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 65 KB

810 Outcome comparison of Percutaneous N

810 Outcome comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) for the treatment of solitary moderate size (1.5 to 2.0 cm) renal stone: A prospective randomized study

✍ Mete, U.; Goswami, A.; Singh, S.; Mandal, A. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 114 KB