𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Re-examining the Validity of Arguments Against Behavioral Goals

✍ Scribed by LEONARD J. WAKS

Book ID
111302482
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1973
Tongue
English
Weight
850 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0013-2004

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

A Re-Examination of the Arguments for Ba
A Re-Examination of the Arguments for Baryon Parity Doublets
✍ B. O. Enflo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1973 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 985 KB

## Abstract The arguments for baryon parity doubling are re‐examined by use of a spin formalism developed by the author together with B. E. LAURENT. It is shown that the transformation between good parity amplitudes and helicity flip and non‐flip amplitudes in Ο€N scattering is ambiguous. It is furt

The R-CRAS and insanity evaluations: a r
The R-CRAS and insanity evaluations: a re-examination of construct validity
✍ Richard Rogers; Kenneth W. Sewell πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 143 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Insanity evaluations are characterized by continued professional debate and the paucity of empirical research. To address the latter, the construct validity of the Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales (R-CRAS; Rogers, 1984) was examined via an extensive re-analysis of 413 insanity cases.