The decision rules yielded respectively by the Rawlsian 'maximin' conception of justice and by classical utilitarianism are compared and contrasted. The discussion is based on the assumption of a pure distribution problem and sharp differences are brought out. An axiomatic analysis of the two concep
β¦ LIBER β¦
Rawls and Bentham reconciled
β Scribed by Udo Ebert
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1988
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 321 KB
- Volume
- 24
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0040-5833
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Rawls versus Bentham: An axiomatic exami
β
Amartya Sen
π
Article
π
1974
π
Springer US
π
English
β 410 KB
β
Puyol, Γngel
π
Fiction
π
2014
π
Spanish
β 169 KB
Nadie ha pensado la justicia en el mundo contemporΓ‘neo con el entusiasmo y el rigor que lo ha hecho John Rawls. DedicΓ³ toda su vida a intentar resolver la tensiΓ³n entre la libertad y la igualdad sin renunciar a ninguna de las dos porque ambas son indispensables para la democracia. Su filosofΓa consi
Melmoth Reconciled
β
Balzac, Honore de
π
Fiction
π
0
π
English
β 43 KB
β
Balzac, Honore de
π
Fiction
π
0
π
und
β 38 KB
β
John Stuart Mill
π
Fiction
π
Italian
β 43 KB
β
Summers, Ally;Clarke, Meredith
π
Fiction
π
2019
π
English
β 55 KB
π 1 views