๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Rationality ideals and mentality

โœ Scribed by John Woods

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Weight
379 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
0920-427X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis

Mackenzie, this journal, this issue, convincingly shows that in certain dialogue games (commitment games) there are procedural restrictions similar to those that I impose on rationality idealizations. But, whereas my rationality analysis is set in the context of belief games, commitment games do not postulate beliefs. Is this significant? I suggest that Mackenzie thinks that it is. There follow discussions of Psychologism and Behaviourism.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Ideals of rationality in dialogic
Ideals of rationality in dialogic
โœ John Woods ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1988 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 856 KB

Needed for such dialogue games as dialectic are appropriate standards of fairness and rationality. The rules of procedure of dialectic must describe a game playable by actual human participants. The present paper centers on certain idealizations of the dialectician that are not allowable.

Woods on Ideals of Rationality in Dialog
Woods on Ideals of Rationality in Dialogue
โœ Jim Mackenzie ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1988 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 566 KB

Woods' paper "Ideals of Rationality in Dialogue" raises six problems for dialogue theory. Woods is right about the seriousness of the problems, but one school of dialogue, that stemming from the work of Charles Hamblin, avoids each of Woods' problems by using commitment instead of belief and by usin

Mentality and causality
Mentality and causality
โœ John Heil ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 815 KB