Rate constants for H + CH4, CH3 + H2, and CH4 dissociation at high temperature
✍ Scribed by J. W. Sutherland; M.-C. Su; J. V. Michael
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 230 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0538-8066
- DOI
- 10.1002/kin.1064
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The Laser Photolysis‐Shock Tube technique coupled with H‐atom atomic resonance absorption spectrometry has been used to study the reaction, H + CH~4~ → CH~3~ + H~2~, over the temperature range, 928–1697 K. Shock‐tube studies on the reverse of this reaction, CH~3~ + H~2~ → H + CH~4~, using CH~3~I dissociation in the presence of H~2~ yielded H‐atom formation rates and rate constants for the reverse process over the temperature range, 1269–1806 K. These results were transformed (using well‐established equilibrium constants) to the forward direction. The combined results for H + CH~4~ can be represented by an experimental three parameter expression, k = 6.78 × 10^−21^ T^3.156^ exp(−4406 K/T) cm^3^ molecule^−1^ s^−1^ (348–1950 K) that was evaluated from the present work and seven previous studies. Using this evaluation, disagreements between previously reported values for the dissociation of CH~4~ could be reconciled. The thermal decomposition of CH~4~ was then studied in Kr bath gas. The dissociation results agreed with the earlier studies and were theoretically modeled with the Troe formalism. The energy transfer parameter necessary to explain both the present results and those of Kiefer and Kumaran (J Phys Chem 1993, 97, 414) is, −〈ΔE〉~all~/cm^−1^ = 0.3323 T^0.7^. The low temperature data on the reverse reaction, H + CH~3~ (in He) from Brouard et al. (J Phys Chem 1989, 93, 4047) were also modeled with the Troe formalism. Lastly, the rate constant for H + CH~4~ was theoretically calculated using conventional transition state theory with Eckart tunneling corrections. The potential energy surface used was from Kraka et al. (J Chem Phys 1993, 99, 5306) and the derived T‐dependence with this method agreed almost perfectly with the experimental evaluation. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 33: 669–684, 2001
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Excess molar volumes at the temperature \(298.15 \mathrm{~K}\) of \(\left[x_{1} \mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CO}_{2}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{2}\right)_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{3}+\right.\) \(x_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{3}\left(\mathrm{CH}_{2}\right)_{5} \mathrm{OH}+\left(1-x_{1}-x_{2}\right)\left\{\mathrm{CH}_{
Rate constant k 1 of CH 4 ϩ M " CH 3 ϩ H ϩ M was determined from time profiles of IR emission at 3.4 m obtained for a CH 4 /Ar mixture heated by incident shock waves at pressures 0.40-0.82 atm and temperatures 1400-2500 K. The emission decrease due to CH 4 decay in a very short period at the shockfr
Excess molar volumes V E m of the ternary mixture {x1CH3(CH2)3OH+x2CH3(CH2)4CH3 + (1-x1-x2)CH3(CH2)3NH2} at the temperatures 298.15 K and 313.15 K, and the binary mixtures {xCH3(CH2)3OH + (1-x)CH3(CH2)3NH2}, {xCH3(CH2)4CH3 + (1-x)CH3(CH2)3NH2} at T=313.15 K have been determined from density measurem
Densities r and speeds of sound u have been measured for {x1CH3(CH2)3OH + x2CH3(CH2)4CH3 + (1-x1-x2)CH3(CH2)3NH2}, and the corresponding mixtures CH2)3NH2}, at T = 298.15 K. Using these results, the isentropic compressibilities kS, the excess isentropic compressibilities k E S , and the speed of sou