For small panels of experts (e.g., boards of managers, courts, specialized committees), n<5, this paper provides an algorithm for ranking the seven efficient and commonly used weighted majority rules by their respective performance. These rules are terned efficient since they constitute the set of p
Ranking of decision rules with random power distribution
β Scribed by Daniel Berend; Yuri Chernyavsky
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 369 KB
- Volume
- 48
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0895-7177
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In collective decision making, the decisional power assigned to each member of the deciding body may have little relation with that member's expertise level. We consider a concept of effectiveness on the family of all decision rules, adapted to such situations. Namely, we measure the performance of a decision rule, when applied to the decision makers, after these have been permuted randomly. We obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for a rule to be more effective than another in this sense, i.e., for its probability of leading to the correct decision to be larger than that of the other. It is shown that, under certain assumptions, the simple majority rule is the most effective, while the expert rule is the least effective. We also deal with the computational complexity involved in applying our condition.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The concept of strict proportional power is introduced, as a means of formalizing a desire to avoid discrepancy between the seat distribution in a voting body and the actual voting power in that body, as measured by power indices in common use. Proportionality is obtained through use of a randomized
Random field models have many applications in image processing and analysis. The main concern of this paper is to design a decision rule for fitting an appropriate random field model to a given image. We assume that the given image is a particular re.libation of a homogenous Gaussian discrete random