𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Randomized Phase II study of two opposite administration sequences of irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Ji-Youn Han; Hyeong-Seok Lim; Dae Ho Lee; So Young Ju; Sung Young Lee; Hyae Young Kim; Yong-Hoon Park; Chun Gun Park; Jin Soo Lee


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
136 KB
Volume
106
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combined chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) is active in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, the optimal administration schedule needs to be defined to maximize its synergic effect. The authors evaluated the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of IP chemotherapy given on two administration sequences in chemotherapy‐naive patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

Eighty eligible patients were assigned randomly to receive 1 of 2 irinotecan and cisplatin administration sequences on Day 1: irinotecan followed by cisplatin (I‐P) (n = 39 patients) or cisplatin followed by irinotecan (P‐I) (n = 41 patients). Treatment was comprised of irinotecan at a dose of 80 mg/m^2^ intravenously on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin at a dose of 60 mg/m^2^ intravenously on Day 1 of a 21‐day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. For PK analysis, serial plasma samples were obtained on Day 1 of the first cycle.

RESULTS

In total, 77 patients were assessable for efficacy. The overall response rate was 47%, and there was a trend in favor of P‐I (54%) compared with I‐P (39%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the P‐I sequence and female gender were found to be significant predictors of a better response (P = 0.047 and P = 0.011, respectively). Overall toxicity profiles and PK parameters were similar in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

IP chemotherapy showed promising activity with a favorable 1‐year survival rate. For future clinical use, the authors recommend administering cisplatin first and then irinotecan, because that sequence was associated with a higher response rate. Cancer 2006. Β© 2006 American Cancer Society.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Phase II study of irinotecan in patien
✍ Karim Fizazi; FrΓ©dΓ©ric Rolland; Christine Chevreau; Jean-Pierre Droz; Dominique πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 71 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Patients with disseminated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have a poor outcome, and the disease is considered highly resistant to chemotherapy. Irinotecan is an active drug in the treatment of a number of neoplastic diseases and is not concerned with the multidrug‐resistance p